
Now that the GOP has dropped its politically untenable objection to extending low-interest student loans, the legislative battle has entered a familiar realm, just weeks ahead of a scheduled rate hike: How should Congress pay for keeping the loans cheap?
It's familiar terrain for observers of the payroll tax fight, which ended with both parties simply agreeing not to pay for the holiday at all. But before they reached that point, the parties bickered over various financing schemes, while pushing ideologically opposed offsets. Republicans wanted cuts to domestic support programs, Democrats wanted to raise income taxes on income over $1 million a year.
This time around, though, the Democrats' opening bid is different -- and they argue that it reflects their willingness to set politics aside and extend the loan rates, currently set to double at the end of June, without a fight, while Republicans try use the coming cliff to eat away at President Obama's health care law.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)The National Education Association is ramping up a public information campaign to build support for closing big corporate tax loopholes and directing the revenue toward key education initiatives. The push comes weeks after the Obama administration released a framework for corporate tax reforms that would be revenue neutral, suggesting a schism between the powerful union and the White House. But in a Monday interview, NEA President Dennis Van Roekel applauded Obama's record on education and said his group's push is meant to raise awareness of one of many ways to finance more federal investment in education.
"One reason to look at corporate taxes is because it is so huge," Van Roekel said, citing the Center for Tax Justice, which concludes (PDF) that closing seven specific corporate tax loopholes could raise nearly $1.5 trillion over 10 years. NEA proposes using the money to raise the maximum Pell grant award to cover half the average cost of public higher education, fund Title I spending on students from low-income families and other initiatives.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)House Republicans' latest budget is a slightly new twist on a familiar theme: low taxes, particularly on the wealthiest, financed by extreme cuts to government spending programs. Knowing the GOP's -- and, frankly many Democrats' -- penchant for high levels of military spending, this mostly means unfathomably deep cuts to domestic health care, education, science and other programs.
Here's the twist. Last year, Republicans took a lot of guff for their plan to turn Medicare in to a subsidized private insurance system. That wasn't just because they proposed to privatize the program, but because the subsidies they proposed were extremely meager -- that's how it saved so much money.
This year, the budget calls for more generous subsidies. Which means that to hit the same long-term deficit targets, Ryan has to cut even deeper into other programs.
Here's how it looks graphically.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Republicans rushed to denounce President Obama's changes to No Child Left Behind in anticipation of the official unveiling Friday morning, deeming the overhaul just another government power grab by Washington.
In a White House ceremony, Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan will announce a new plan to allow states to seek waivers on the NCLB requirement for school proficiency by 2014. But in order to qualify for the exceptions, states must follow education policy changes dictated by the administration.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Campaigning in New Hampshire Thursday, Texas Governor, and GOP Presidential candidate Rick Perry claimed that Texas public schools teach both evolution and creationism in their science classes.
Perry described evolution as "a theory that is out there," telling a young child questioning him that "it's got some gaps in it." That's why, he said, "in Texas we teach both creationism and evolution in our public schools. Because I figure...because I figure you're smart enough to figure out which one is right."
There's just one problem with that: in 1987 the Supreme Court ruled that teaching creationism in public schools is an unconstitutional violation of the Establishment Clause.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)The ratings agency Moody's is threatening to reduce the rating of five states with AAA credit (along with the rating of the federal government) if Congress fails to raise the debt limit in early August. Now the governor of one of those states -- Maryland's Martin O'Malley -- is publicly singling out the Republicans in Congress who are preventing swift action on the debt limit.
"All of this brinksmanship and these threats of the dinosaur wing of the Republican party led by Eric Cantor to drive us needlessly into a default have impacted confidence I think throughout the country," O'Malley told me in a Tuesday interview. "It's impacted consumer confidence, it's impacted investor confidence, it's impacted the confidence of small businesses who are the backbone of this economy and who need to hire again. In that respect it's already had an effect. The closer we get to this deadline, and the more immediate ramifications that has for those of us that are going out into the bond market."
These concerns will become very real if Congress doesn't raise the debt limit in the next few days.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Another day, another entry for Rick Santorum's list of liberal conspiracies.
This time Santorum is arguing that the reason so few U.S. students perform well in U.S. history is because of "a conscious effort on the part of the left who has a huge influence on our curriculum, to desensitize America to what American values are so they're more pliable to the new values that they would like to impose on America."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Obama Calls For Reform Of No Child Left Behind
In this weekend's YouTube address, President Obama called upon Congress to replace the No Child Left Behind Act, with states being given flexibility for education reform as has been done with his administration's "Race to the Top" grants.
"Our challenge now is to allow all fifty states to benefit from the success of Race to the Top," said Obama. "We need to promote reform that gets results while encouraging communities to figure out what's best for their kids. That why it's so important that Congress replace No Child Left Behind this year - so schools have that flexibility. Reform just can't wait."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Republican governors stormed into state houses this January after campaigning against federal spending, and various so-called state bailouts. They won in part by painting a slanted picture of fiscal mismanagement by their Democratic predecessors.
That rhetoric -- and the rhetoric of their more senior Republican peers -- continues to this day, and occasionally translates into genuinely puzzling acts of malgovernance. Florida Governor Rick Scott, for example, turned down $2.4 billion in federal funds to build a high-speed rail line from Orlando to Tampa.
But in other ways, their failure to publicly embrace additional federal commitments during tough economic times has left them behind the eight ball, politically. As the costs to their states of providing needed social services has risen, and their revenue has fallen, they're looking for sub rosa ways to take the money without catching flak from their bases.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)During the first stop of a three-day campaign-style blitz across the country promoting his vision for reducing the $1.4 trillion deficit, President Obama decried the country's "crumbling" infrastructure and said proposed GOP cuts would lead to "potholes everywhere."
The Republican plan, he said, would cut transportation costs by a third, leading to more deterioration of the nation's roads and bridges, which would in turn, would hamper economic growth.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)House Republicans and Senate Democrats have posted details of the bipartisan spending agreement that staved off a shutdown, providing a first look at where the $39.9 billion of cuts come from on a program by program basis.
Republican priorities can be seen throughout the agreement, with reduced funding for enforcing environmental regulation, scientific research, health care, and education all leaping out.
One of the hardest hit institutions is the Environmental Protection Agency, whose power Republicans have sought to curtail in recent years through a variety of legislative means. The agency will receive $1.6 billion less in funding than current levels, a 16 percent drop, including a $49 million reduction in climate change programs and $149 million cut to the Land and Water Conservation Fund. In a press release, Senate Appropriation Committee Democrats noted that the EPA cuts, while tough, were nearly $1.6 billion less than Republicans' original proposal. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration also saw a $142 million reduction in funding and is prohibited from creating a Climate Service.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Cost Of Military Campaign In Libya Could Wipe Out GOP's Spending Cuts
The Hill reports: "U.S. military operations in Libya could wipe out a significant chunk of the budget cuts won by congressional Republicans in recent weeks, defense analysts say. GOP leaders have trumpeted enacted spending reductions that amount to more than $285 million per day since the beginning of March. But defense analysts say the Pentagon could be burning through more than $100 million per day in Libya, putting those budget savings at risk."
Obama's Day Ahead
The First Family departed from Santiago, Chile, at 8 a.m. ET, and will arrive at 2:45 p.m. ET in San Salvador, El Salvador. The President and First Lady will participate in an arrival ceremony at 3:30 p.m. ET. Obama will hold a bilateral meeting with El Salvadoran President Mauricio Funes at 3:50 p.m. ET, , with an expanded bilateral meeting at 4:20 p.m. ET, and a joint press conference at 4:55 p.m. ET. The President and First Lady will attend an official dinner hosted by President Funes at 10:10 p.m. ET.
Target In Libya Is Clear; Intent Is Not
The New York Times reports: "President Obama's decision to authorize military strikes against Libya exposed him to another set of political crosscurrents from right and left and further complicated his plan to keep his agenda focused on the domestic economy. As the air assault continued for a second day in Libya, Mr. Obama sought to project an air of normalcy and play down the role of the United States. He continued his visit to South America without altering his schedule, and barely mentioned, in a televised speech from Brazil, that allied forces were engaged in another military intervention in a Muslim world."
Obama's Day Ahead
The First Family departed from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, at 8:15 a.m. ET, will arrive at 12:20 p.m. ET in Santiago, Chile, and the President and First Lady will participate in an arrival ceremony at 12:50 p.m. ET. President Obama and Chilean President Sebastian Piñera will take an official photo at 1 p.m. ET, hold a bilateral meeting at 1:05 P.M. ET, and hold an expanded bilateral meeting at 1:25 p.m. ET. Obama and Piñera will hold a joint press conference at 2:05 p.m. ET. Obama will deliver a speech at 3:20 p.m. ET, at Centro Cultural Palacio La Moneda. The President and First Lady will attend a U.S. Embassy meet and greet at 4:30 p.m. ET, at the Sheraton Cristobal Hotel in Santiago. The President and First Lady will arrive at La Moneda Palace at 7:15 p.m. ET, and attend an official dinner hosted by PResident Piñera at 7:25 p.m. ET.
The progressive group Americans United for Change will go live Wednesday with a new ad slamming Republicans for prioritizing subsidies for big oil corporations over federal education spending.
"There is a right way and a wrong way to get our country's fiscal house in order and Republicans have chosen the wrong path: corporate welfare over the well being of Americans and our children's education," says Tom McMahon, executive director of Americans United.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)U.S. Nuclear Industry Faces New Uncertainty
The New York Times reports: "The fragile bipartisan consensus that nuclear power offers a big piece of the answer to America's energy and global warming challenges may have evaporated as quickly as confidence in Japan's crippled nuclear reactors."
Obama's Day Ahead
At 10:20 a.m. ET, President Obama will visit a classroom in Arlington, Virginia, and deliver a speech on education reform at 10:40 a.m. ET. He will meet with senior advisers at the White House at 11:55 a.m. ET. He will meet at 1:45 p.m. ET with Danish Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen, and they will deliver statements to the press at 2:25 p.m. ET. Obama will meet at 3 p.m. ET with General David Petraeus. At 7:30 p.m. ET, he will attend a DNC fundraising event at 7:30 p.m. ET.
For Rep Ron Paul (R-TX), education and medical care are not rights but rather "things that you have to earn."
In an exchange about U.S. credit policy with MSNBC's Cenk Uygur on Wednesday, Paul was asked whether people should be able to borrow money to buy a house, or car. "Oh, in a free market, you can do that," Paul said, but only so long as that credit is backed up by real money, and not something that "comes out of thin air."
Uygur asked the Congressman if students who can't afford tuition should be able to get government loans. "No one has a right to anyone's wealth, I don't have a right to come to you and say my poor kid needs 500 dollars for an education," Paul replied, "an education is not a right, medical care is not a right."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)House Republicans and Senate Democrats have arrived at detente on spending, which should prevent a government shutdown through the Ides of March.
But it's a brief and fragile detente, and for now only masks a greater divide between the parties -- one that's less about spending levels and more about the right of the Obama administration to undertake routine functions in an era of divided government.
After a weeks-long stare-down over spending, both sides blinked last week, when they came to terms on a two week measure to keep the federal lights on after funding runs out March 4.
But Democrats blinked fastest.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Obama To Name Intel CEO To White House Jobs Panel
Reuters reports: " Intel Corp Chief Executive Paul Otellini will be named to a panel of experts advising President Barack Obama on jobs, the White House said on Friday. Otellini will join the President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, created in January to focus on lifting hiring and promoting growth. General Electric Co Chief Executive Jeffrey Immelt was named last month to lead the new outside board advising the White House on economic policy. Other members of the Council will be named in the coming weeks, the White House said."
Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama is beginning his day in California. He will depart from San Francisco at 11:30 a.m. ET, arriving at 1:05 p.m. ET in Portland, Oregon. He will tour the Intel Corporation semiconductor manufacturing facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, at 1:45 p.m. ET. At 2:25 p.m. ET he will view student demonstrations by Intel Science Talent Search finalists, and he will deliver remarks on education at 2:35 p.m. ET. He will depart from Portland at 4 p.m. ET, arriving at 8:30 p.m. ET at Andrews Air Force Base, and back at the White House at 8:45 p.m. ET.
Obama: I Will not 'Shortchange Our Children's Education'
In this weekend's YouTube address, President Obama declared his commitment to strengthening the country's education system, and attacked Republicans for wanting to cut education spending by 20 percent.
"Now, it is true that when it comes to our budget, we have real challenges to meet. And if we're serious about getting our fiscal house in order, we'll need to make some tough choices. I'm prepared to make those choices," said Obama. "But what I'm not prepared to do is shortchange our children's education. What I'm not prepared to do is undercut their economic future, your economic future, or the economic future of the United States of America. Nothing would be more detrimental to our prospects for success than cutting back on education. It would consign America to second place in our fiercely competitive global economy. But China and India aren't playing for second. South Korea and Germany aren't playing for second. They're playing for first - and so should America."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)"With common-sense exceptions for seniors, veterans, and our troops, we will roll back government spending to pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels, saving us at least $100 billion in the first year alone and putting us on a path to balance the budget and pay down the debt."
So reads the House Republicans' "Pledge to America" -- a supposedly deficit-reducing plan that calls for trillions of dollars' worth of specific tax cuts, but only $100 billion of non-specific spending cuts to offset that cost.
Still, $100 billion pays for a lot of things. Bloomberg took a close look at just what would take a hit under the Republican plan -- adding specificity where the Republicans offered none. Here are the top five issues that would suffer under the Pledge to America.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Beck On His Obama-Is-A-Racist Comment 'I Have A Big Fat Mouth Sometimes'
Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Glenn Beck sought to correct his statement from a year ago, in which he said that President Obama had a "deep-seated hatred for white people." "I have a big fat mouth sometimes and I say things, and that's not the way people should behave," said Beck. He further explained: "I think that it is much more of a theological question that he is a guy who understands the world through liberation theology, which is oppressor and victim."
Joe Miller: Transfer Control Of Land Back To The States
Appearing on Face The Nation, Senate candidate Joe Miller (R-AK) said that the federal government should transfer control of lands to his state, in exchange for cutting federal subsidies. "The answer to this is to basically transfer the responsibilities and power of government back to the states and the people. That is really the only answer, I think, out of this crisis," said Miller, who may have defeated incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the GOP primary, depending on the final absentee ballot results. "As we continue to tighten our belts because fiscally that's critical for the economic solvency of this nation, we also transfer it to the states more power. That means more ownership of lands. It's not a situation where you just yank the financial plug, but at the same time you're transferring over discretion over the use of the resource base."
An amusing meme has popped up on the right, opposing the state education aid bill that passed last week: It's not just bad policy from big-spending Washington liberals -- it's a criminal enterprise!
Here's how the logic goes: President Obama and the Democrats spent a lot of money to prop up school districts in the midst of a tough economy and revenue shortfalls at the district level. Much of that money will pay teachers; some of that money will then go to union dues; in turn, the unions will spend money to campaign for Democrats. Ergo, the whole bill was an act of money laundering, to have the federal government fund Democratic campaigns.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)
Republicans know they could retake the House of Representatives. But, they say, they're reluctant to adopt a complete legislative agenda until they complete a nationwide listening session -- part of their new America Speaking Out initiative, which included a listening session with the nation's top corporate lobbyists.
They've tipped their hand just a bit recently, however. America Speaking Out allowed voters to suggest, in brief, some policy prescriptions they hope the GOP will back. In a recent web video, House Republicans picked 20 of their favorites. Many of them will be familiar to anyone who paid attention to the GOP agenda for the last decade. Some of them Republicans liked so much they picked them twice... verbatim.
"The Government needs to enact a balance [sic] budget amendment so that the government can finally learn to live and need speed [sic] more than what we have," writes Republican1988. (This would, of course, make extending the Bush tax cuts nearly impossible.)
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Obama And Netanyahu To Hold Fence-Mending Talks
President Obama is having a much-awaited meeting today with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Associated Press reports: "Expectations for a major breakthrough are low, and Netanyahu made no comments to reporters on his flight from Tel Aviv. But the meeting, postponed a month ago after a deadly Israeli raid on a Gaza aid flotilla, could be a test of whether Obama can overcome recent tensions with Netanyahu and work together to restart long-suspended direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. Obama is not likely to risk another diplomatic clash with Netanyahu with pivotal U.S. congressional elections looming in November and pro-Israel sentiment strong among American lawmakers and voters."
Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama will receive the presidential daily briefing at 9:30 a.m. ET, and the economic daily briefing at 10 a.m. ET. He will meet at 11 a.m. ET with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and the two will hold a joint press availability at 12 p.m. ET, and a working lunch at 12:35 p.m. ET. He will meet at 4:30 p.m. ET with Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.
President Obama today will detail the money in his budget proposal for a national effort to turnaround the nation's worst schools and a new plan aimed at reducing the drop-out rates among high schoolers.
The plan is built upon the idea that engaging students from as early as sixth grade can make sure they stay on track, and identifying troubled teens early and devoting alternative resources to those students will help keep them there. It looks to better prepare students for both college and going directly to a career.
Obama will outline the plan at an America's Promise Alliance Education event today at the Chamber of Commerce with Colin Powell and Alma Powell. The White House said Obama will talk about the need to reform the worst schools, and in some cases shut them down or take them over.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)Former Rep. Pat Toomey (R-PA), the presumptive nominee for Senate in Pennsylvania in 2010, seems to really be going out of his way to shed his old image of being a right-wing fire-breather. In the latest example, Toomey's campaign has released a statement praising President Obama's back-to-school speech:
Allentown, PA - U.S. Senate candidate Pat Toomey called President Obama's speech today to school children in Arlington, Virginia "an inspiring and moving speech for students across America."PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
"Education is the cornerstone of our country's future," Mr. Toomey said, "and it is important that we relay that message to our young students. The President's emphasis on responsibility and the personal stories about his own education are exactly the kind of inspiring messages our children need to hear from our country's leaders."
Karl Rove appeared on Fox News today, and joined in on the emerging right-wing line that the White House changed the text of the back-to-school speech -- which they say would have originally been aimed at political indoctrination of schoolchildren -- after conservatives objected. And Rove also charged that the whole speech is an improper use of government resources to advance President Obama's political profile.
"Oh, I bet it was," Rove said, when he was asked whether it was rewritten. "I mean, look, the White House was tone deaf, they clearly had a purpose here, which was, let's have the President speak to every student in the country, let's have a study guide, let's have them write the President and the President can write them back.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (2)White House Aides: Obama To Be Forceful In Speech To Congress
CNN reports that White House aides say President Obama will make a strong case to Congress in his upcoming speech on health care. "He will be very forceful," said one senior Obama aide. "He will be making the case for action." Another aide said: "He will make a strong case Wednesday night on what health-care reform means to Americans."
Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama will hold a discussion with 9th graders at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia, at 10:45 a.m. ET, along with Sec. of Education Arne Duncan. He will deliver his back-to-school speech at 12 p.m. ET. At 2 p.m. ET, Obama and Vice President Biden will attend an investiture ceremony in honor of Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Obama and Biden will meet with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Speaker Nancy Pelosi at 2:45 p.m. ET. Obama and Biden will meet with the Professional Golfers Association Champions of America, at 3:50 p.m. ET.
Florida GOP chairman Jim Greer appeared on CNN today, and accused the White House of changing the content of President Obama's stay-in-school speech in the wake of conservative outrage at political indoctrination -- outrage that he was instrumental in mobilizing, by the way -- and that the original would have been much more politically-oriented.
"Clearly last week there was a plan with the Department of Education," said Greer. "When you ask students to write a letter to the President on, how we can help you with your new ideas, Mr. President, that is leading the students in an effort to push the President's agenda. Now that the White House got their hand in the cookie jar caught, they changed everything, they redid the lesson plans, they released the text, and tomorrow he's gonna give a speech that every president should have an opportunity to give."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (2)It's become clear that as President Obama delivers his speech on staying in school, a whole lot of schools won't be showing it.
As we noted before, some local groups are organizing in favor of the speech, and opposing school officials who have decided not to show it. Most schools are doing the sensible thing and allowing parents who object to their kids seeing a speech by that evil socialist dictator to opt out. But some aren't showing it at all.
Here's just a small sampling of some more schools and school districts that won't be showing the speech, available after the jump.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (5)Florida Republican Party chairman Jim Greer, who made waves last week when he sent out a press release attacking President Obama's stay-in-school message, is now expressing his approval of the pre-released text, ABC News reports. In fact, he'll even let his own kids watch it -- but he stands by his earlier criticism.
"It's a good speech," said Greer. "It encourages kids to stay in school and the importance of education and I think that's what a president should do when they're gonna talk to students across the country."
Here's what Greer first said last week:
"As the father of four children, I am absolutely appalled that taxpayer dollars are being used to spread President Obama's socialist ideology. The idea that school children across our nation will be forced to watch the President justify his plans for government-run health care, banks, and automobile companies, increasing taxes on those who create jobs, and racking up more debt than any other President, is not only infuriating, but goes against beliefs of the majority of Americans, while bypassing American parents through an invasive abuse of power."PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs today fired back at right-wing critics who have attacked President Obama's upcoming stay-in-school speech. From today's press gaggle:
"I think it's a sad, sad day that the political back and forth has intruded on anyone speaking to schoolchildren and teachers and parents about the responsibilities that they have as we enter a new school year. If one kid in one school hears one message and goes from being a D student to a C student, then the speech is worth it. If one kid decides not to drop out of school, then the speech is worth it. Right now nearly three in 10 kids in school will not walk across a stage and get a high school diploma. If anybody thinks that's the recipe for long-term economic growth, I've got news for them.PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
A voice of sanity is now emerging on the right over President Obama's stay-in-school speech tomorrow: Newt Gingrich.
Gingrich put up this Twitter post this afternoon, after the White House released the text of the speech:
Just read President Obamas speech to students.white House posted it. it is a good speech and will be good for students to hear
And he followed it up with this:
Remember that Presidents Reagan and Bush also talked to students nationwide. As long as it is non political and pro education it is good
Gingrich also appeared yesterday on Fox News Sunday, and spoke out in favor of the speech.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (3)During his speech now at the Cincinnati AFL-CIO Labor Day picnic, President Obama just got in an ad-libbed jab at the right-wingers who are speaking out against his back-to-school speech.
Obama said he was for "an America that commits to education, because the countries that out-educate us today will out-compete us tomorrow. And the best jobs will go to the best-educated. So we got to do a better job educating our sons and our daughters."
He then deviated from the prepared remarks -- and the crowd cheered quite passionately along with it: "And yes, I'm gonna have something to say tomorrow to our children, telling them to stay in school and work hard, 'cause that's the right message to send."
After the extended cheering quieted down a bit, Obama let out a brief laugh, and continued with his remarks.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Amidst the right-wing activists mobilizing against President Obama's national back-to-school address, there's also another narrative emerging: A backlash of sorts by relatively saner people, speaking out in favor of the speech, and against local officials who have decided to not show it.
The makeup of these groups differs from place to place. In some areas it's a county Democratic organization. In others, it's headed up by churches and civil rights activists.
All in all, it's a fun additional wrinkle to a very absurd story -- and it presents another side of the narrative that definitely deserves attention. Check out some examples, after the jump.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)Axelrod: Public Option A "Good Tool," But Shouldn't Define Whole Debate
Appearing on Meet The Press, White House Senior Advisor David Axelrod said that President Obama "believes the public option is a good tool." However, Axelrod also added, "It shouldn't define the whole health care debate, however."
Van Jones Resigns
Van Jones, President Obama's adviser on green jobs, has resigned in the wake of controversy surrounding past attacks on Republican, and his having signed a petition by 9/11 Truthers years ago. "On the eve of historic fights for health care and clean energy, opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me," Jones said in his resignation letter, also adding: "I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past. We need all hands on deck, fighting for the future."
The White House has released a pair of public service announcements on the importance of education, tying into President Obama's upcoming back-to-school message next week -- the one that right-wingers are attacking as an example of socialist indoctrination.
Here's the first one, with Obama saying he wouldn't have been at his inauguration ceremony, if he hadn't been at his graduation ceremony first:
There's also another PSA featuring a bunch of popular NASCAR drivers, a sport we usually associate with the Republican-leaning parts of America. Check it out after the jump.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)In the wake of objections by many on the right against President Obama's upcoming address to schoolchildren -- reminding them on the first day of school about the importance of education, and telling them to work hard -- many schools across the country are dealing with objections from parents who don't want their children exposed to such a harmful, socialist message.
"I don't recall ever having a sitting president addressing schoolchildren," said Andrew Palomo, the father of a student in suburban Chicago. "For major events, maybe, but not the first day of school. The whole thing makes me angry as an American."
It should be noted that Obama's address isn't really a new thing, though -- and furthermore, the subject matter of Obama's address is pretty tame compared to past Republican presidents. As DailyKosTV points out, George H.W. Bush gave an address on education policy -- not just education itself as a virtue -- to American classrooms in late 1991. And Media Matters notes that a lame-duck Ronald Reagan spoke via TV to schoolchildren in 1988, and promoted tax cuts during the course of the discussion.
So let's check out some other examples of outrage.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (2)I asked Florida state GOP press secretary Katie Gordon for comment from chairman Jim Greer about the latest developments regarding President Obama's upcoming speech to schoolchildren -- namely the decision of the Department of Education to revise a section of its materials about how children could "help the president," to remove that phrase.
Gordon e-mailed me back: "He [Greer] is still concerned about what the President will say, but the White House revisions shows that President Obama now knows that parents across this country will be watching and listening carefully to his speech to our children."
The materials now more clearly ask students "how they can achieve their short‐term and long‐term education goals," which was what the students were supposed to help Obama with before. The new version is now free of any potential political context from that section.
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (0)The Department of Education has now changed their supplementary materials on President Obama's upcoming address to schoolchildren on the importance of education -- eliminating a phrase that some conservatives, such as the Florida GOP, happened to have been bashing as evidence of socialist indoctrination in our schools.
In a set of bullet points listed under a heading, "Extension of the Speech," one of the points used to say: "Write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president. These would be collected and redistributed at an appropriate later date by the teacher to make students accountable to their goals."
However, that bullet point now reads as follows: "Write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short‐term and long‐term education goals. These would be collected and redistributed at an appropriate later date by the teacher to make students accountable to their goals."
PERMALINK | COMMENTS | RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (1)
